Disposed

Khaderu v. Additional Commissioner (First) and 2 Others

Allahabad HC25 Sept 2023WRIC/28033/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction under mandamus for the respondent commissioner to decide a restoration application preferred by the petitioner within six months, affording a hearing to concerned parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent Additional Commissioner to decide the petitioner's restoration application within six months after affording a hearing to concerned parties.

Khaderu Vs Additional Commissioner (First) and 2… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:185144

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28033 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Khaderu Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (First) And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Lok Nath Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents no.1 and 3 as well as Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

¶7

Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.1 to decide the restoration application dated 16.12.2022 preferred by the petitioner in Revision No.C2006140000499 of 2006 (Khaderu Vs. Bhagauti and others), expeditiously.

¶8

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid restoration application is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.1 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶10

Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.1 is hereby directed to consider and decide the restoration application dated 16.12.2022 preferred by the petitioner in Revision No.C2006140000499 of 2006 (Khaderu Vs. Bhagauti and others), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶11

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 25.9.2023 Vivek Kr.

¶13

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Khaderu v. Additional Commissioner (First) and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khaderu v. Additional Commissioner (First) and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sayed Sayeed Shah Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kadhora Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Ram Adhar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Nilesh Agrawal Vs Nagar Nigam Mathura-Brindawan and Another

Salman Ansari Vs State of U.P. and 23 Others

Ram Nivas Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others