In chamber, the High Court directed the Sub Division Magistrate, Prayagraj, to decide a specific restoration application within six months without examining the merits of the underlying dispute.
Direction to respondent no.16 to decide the restoration application dated 29.04.2022 within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:194857
In Chamber
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27848 of 2023
Petitioner :- Seema Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, to direct the respondent no.16, i.e. the Sub Division Magistrate, Soraon, Prayagraj to decide the Suit no.T202102030304175, under section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (for Settlement of boundary dispute), namely Seema Devi Vs. Gram Sabha & others, expeditiously within stipulated period."
Order Date :- 10.10.2023/Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Seema Devi
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
