Ram Mishra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition for want of prosecution, the petitioner failed to appear. The High Court dismissed the petition and vacated the interim order.
In a writ petition for want of prosecution, the petitioner failed to appear. The High Court dismissed the petition and vacated the interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:109441
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2769 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ram Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Chandra Tiwari,Mridul Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
List revised.
None appears to press the petition.
It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.5.2023 Vipasha
Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Mishra
State Of U.P.
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court