Disposed

Anju @ Annu v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC25 Aug 2023WRIC/27675/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the respondent authority to expeditiously decide a pending mutation application under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within one year after affording a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 to decide the mutation/transfer application within one year from the date of service of the order after affording hearing to parties.

Anju @ Annu Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171853

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27675 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Anju @ Annu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Azad Rai,Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents no.1 and 2.

¶7

Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.2 to decide mutation/transfer application dated 14.11.2022 filed by the petitioner bearing Case No.4276/5280/2022, Computer Case No.22053100705856 (Anju@ Annu Vs. Suresh and others), under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

¶8

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid matter is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶10

Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide the mutation/transfer application dated 14.11.2022 filed by the petitioner bearing Case No.4276/5280/2022, Computer Case No.22053100705856 (Anju@ Annu Vs. Suresh and others), under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶11

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 25.8.2023 Vivek Kr.

¶13

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anju @ Annu v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anju @ Annu v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brij Narayan and 19 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Home Secy. and 4 Others

Prabhu Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Devanti Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Manik Chandra Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Himanshu Gaurav Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sardar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others