Petitioner sought a mandamus for compliance of a 1989 mutation order affirmed in 2005. Stating that the order was already complied with, the court held no cause of action exists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171999
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21470 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sardar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devesh Kumar Shukla,Dharmesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 25.8.2023 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for compliance of a mutation order that has already been satisfied.
Sardar Singh
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
