The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of a writ petition filed for expediting proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The court held that since the respondent had already initiated proceedings and afforded an opportunity of hearing, no cause of action remained for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:175475
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26358 of 2023
Petitioner :- Munishwar Prasad Bharti Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivdhesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 6.9.2023 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is a cause of action for the petitioner to pursue the writ petition regarding the expediting of revenue proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Munishwar Prasad Bharti
State of U.P.
Another
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
