The court held that mandatory procedure under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was followed with notice and adjudication pending, dismissing the petitioner's petition to expedite proceedings as there was no cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:175475
Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26221 of 2023 Petitioner :- Munishwar Prasad Bharti Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivdhesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 6.9.2023/Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has any cause of action to sustain the writ petition for expediting proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 given that notice and opportunity of hearing have bee
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Munishwar Prasad Bharti
State of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
