Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear to press the petition. The petitioner was omitting to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:184810
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23819 of 2020
Petitioner :- Asphak Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Lokesh Kumar Dwivedi
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Sri Lokesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 9 is present along with learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.9.2023 Shiraz
Digitally signed by :- SHIRAZ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Asphak
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
