Jang Bahadur Patel v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:195830 Court No. - 51 Case :-…
No. - 2023:AHC:195830 Court No. - 51 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:195830
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23494 of 2023
Petitioner :- Jang Bahadur Patel Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Srivastava,Ajay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1.Mr. Ajay Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during pendency of the writ petition, the fisheries lease has been granted in favour of the petitioner in respect to the pond in dispute. He placed copy of the proceeding before the Court.
2. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, no cause of action survives in the matters and the instant writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 11.10.2023 PS*
Digitally signed by :- PRITI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jang Bahadur Patel
State Of U.P.
Chandra Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court