The High Court, Allahabad, consigned the writ petition to records in default of appearance. The court noted the petitioner has a statutory remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act and left pursuing that open.
Writ petition consigned to records; statutory remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:157006-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22123 of 2023
Petitioner :- M/S Mohd. Alim Murgi Chara Udyog Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Shankar Pd Gupta,Girijesh Kumar Gupta
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Agrawal
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
None appears for the petitioner even when the matter is taken up in the revised list.
Sri Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondents points out that petitioner otherwise has statutory remedy of approaching the DRT under section 17 of the SARFEASI Act, which has not been availed.
Leaving it open for the petitioner to pursue statutory remedy before the competent forum, this writ petition is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 4.8.2023 Ashok Kr.
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Mohd. Alim Murgi Chara Udyog
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
