The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad held the writ petition involuntary because it had become infructuous and dismissed it.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:111735-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22045 of 2007
Petitioner :- Chaudhary Udayveer Singh And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Chadha,T.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anshu Chaudhary,K.R. Sirohi,K.R.Singh Jadaun
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
Sri K.R. Singh Jadaun and Sri Anshu Chaudhary, the counsel for respondents are present.
Mohd. Aon, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rishi Chadha, the counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement given by the counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.5.2023 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaudhary Udayveer Singh And Another
State of U.P. and Others
Salil Kumar Rai
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
