Petition for writ was dismissed as infructuous. Counsel submitted that the FIR against petitioner No. 2 existed, rendering the present petition no longer viable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:191841
Court No. - 50
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21628 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Pooja And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that First Information Report has been lodged against the petitioner No.2. The petitioners are no more inclined to press the present writ petition, and same be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.10.2023 A. K. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Pooja
Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
