This writ petition was disposed of as perineous since the underlying case was registered under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner was advised to wait for the finalization of those proceedings.
The writ petition stands disposed of; personal appearance of respondents dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:176659
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21493 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ravineesh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avinash Chandra Srivastava
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 11.9.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravineesh Yadav
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
