Disposed

Sadanand Singh v. State of U.P. and 16 Others

Allahabad HC30 May 2023WRIC/16576/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ for expeditious disposal of a pending suit concerning property rights. The High Court directed the Deputy Collector to conclude the proceedings within eight months, allowing personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 (Deputy Collector) to conclude proceedings of Suit No. 174 of 2021 within eight months.

Sadanand Singh Vs State of U.P. and 16 Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:121493

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16576 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sadanand Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Buddha Prakash,Sushil Kumar (Ii) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents as well as learned counsel representing the Gaon Sabha.

¶5

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Suit No. 174 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T202115090403062) (Sadanand Singh vs Jai Shankar and others) under section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before the respondent No. 2 Deputy Collector Rasra, Ballia, within stipulated period.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and, therefore, this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶7

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of eight months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.

¶9

In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶10

Order Date :- 30.5.2023 Sazia

¶11

Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sadanand Singh v. State of U.P. and 16 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadanand Singh v. State of U.P. and 16 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rama Shankar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rudal Vs Up Zila Adhkari and 8 Others

Jagat Narayan and 18 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Pradeep Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Nasir Hussain Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Santosh Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others