Court dismissed the writ petition regarding a dispute over a sale deed and shop interference, holding it not a proper remedy without expressing an opinion on merits.
Writ petition dismissed without expressing opinion on merits, leaving parties to avail other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:121692
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16573 of 2023
Petitioner :- Rastriya Sabha And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Kumar Rai,Santosh Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
Order Date :- 30.5.2023 SFH
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is a proper remedy for a dispute over a sale deed and interference with a shop.
Whether the grievance regarding a sale deed executed between private respondents warrants writ relief.
Rastriya Sabha And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
