Dismissed

Poonam Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC9 May 2023WRIC/14619/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court reduced a case for disposal under the U.P. Revenue Code-2006, directing the respondent authorities to conclude proceedings within six months, allowing personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conclude proceedings of Case No. T-202202030801252 within six months. Allow personal appearance if lawyers do not cooperate.

Poonam Devi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:99219

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14619 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Poonam Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.T-202202030801252 of 2022 (Poonam Devi v. Phoolkali & Ors.) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 within stipulated period.

¶8

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

4. Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

5 . In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-Naib Tehsildar Meza, Tehsil-Meza, District-Prayagraj to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

6. In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 9.5.2023 Jyotsana

¶13

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Poonam Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Poonam Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Patel Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Kripa Shankar Verma Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Adarsh Kumar Pandey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Raja Chatar Pratap Singh and 2 Others Vs Commissioner Aligarh and 3 Others

Ram Murti Maurya Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Krishnawati Devi and 3 Others Vs Additional Commissioner (Administration) Varanasi Division and 2 Others