Disposed

Kripa Shankar Verma v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC8 May 2023WRIC/14275/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a land title registration case pending in writing up. The Court directed the Tehsildar to conclude proceedings within three months and permitted personal appearance if advocates fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Tehsildar, Rasara, District Ballia to conclude proceedings within three months; permission for personal appearance if lawyers do not cooperate.

Kripa Shankar Verma Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:97568

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14275 of 2023 Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Verma,Om Prakash Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶6

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Restoration Application No.1483 of 2022 (Computerized Case No.T-202215090401483) (Kripa Shankar v. Pradeep) within stipulated period.

¶7

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶8

4. Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶9

5 . In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Rasara, District-Ballia to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶10

6. In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶11

Order Date :- 8.5.2023 Jyotsana

¶12

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kripa Shankar Verma v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kripa Shankar Verma v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Bhagwandas Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Santosh Kumar Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Akhtar Vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hapur and 2 Others

Rajendra Patel Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Adarsh Kumar Pandey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Pinku Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others