A single judge reserved a writ petition directly disposing it with a direction to conclude proceedings of a land revenue case expeditiously within six months, permitting personal appearance if lawyers abstain.
Direction to the Tehsildar to conclude the proceedings of the revenue case expeditiously within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:98067
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14301 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pinku Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.T-202215510201782 (Pinku v. Suryanath) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 within stipulated period.
3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5 . In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil-Ghosi, District-Mau to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.
6. In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.
Order Date :- 8.5.2023 Jyotsana
Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pinku Yadav
State Of U.P.
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
