Due to the recall of the impugned order by the lower authority before this court, the petitioner's writ petition was found to be devoid of any surviving legal issue and was dismissed as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:190116-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11646 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dinesh Nigam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar Gupta,Rajpal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Tiwari,Kuldeep Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Sri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh submits that the impugned order dated 24.3.2023 has already been recalled and as such, the cause of filing the writ petition no more survives.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 RKP
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Nigam
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
