The High Court held that highly disputed facts regarding fraudulent endorsement of a sale instrument cannot be adjudicated under Article 226. It advised the petitioner to seek common law remedies. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of; common law remedy advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:189498-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29593 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ass Mohammad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deshraj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 3.10.2023 SP/
Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether highly disputed facts alleging fraud in endorsement of sale instrument can be adjudicated under writ jurisdiction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ass Mohammad
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
