This judgment dismisses an unrepresented writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:65643
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1005175 of 2013
Petitioner :- Smt. Anita Srivastava And Another Respondent :- Learned Court Of District Judge Distt. Court Lucknow And Anr Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,Shyam Ji Shukla
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. No one appears to press this petition even in the revised call.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.10.2023
VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Anita Srivastava And Another
Learned Court Of District Judge Distt. Court Lucknow And Anr
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
