In this thin order of the Allahabad High Court, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or respond when the case was called out for hearing in the revised list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1001450 of 2013
Petitioner :- Mayo Institute Of Medical Sciences Objection Filed Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Mines And Minerals Ando Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Raj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1 . Case called out in revised list but none responds on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition.
2 . Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3 . Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.10.2023 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mayo Institute Of Medical Sciences
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Mines And Minerals
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
