With the petitioner absent despite the matter being called, the single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1002048 of 2013
Petitioner :- Munna Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply And 2 Other Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1 . Case called out in revised list but none responds on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition.
2 . Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3 . Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.10.2023 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Munna Lal
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
