Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Consolidation Commissioner to issue a decision on pending consolidation reports. The High Court dismissed the petition, noting that mandamus is barred by a prior Division Bench judgment and is ultimately a matter for the concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236623
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4109 of 2023
Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tripathi B.G. Bhai,Pramod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023
AK
Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued commanding the Consolidation Commissioner to decide on outstanding reports regarding land consolidation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Agricultural & Industrial Syndicate Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.Distinguished¶9
1975 SCC OnLine All 521 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Kumar
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
