Kashmir Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged inordinate delay in deciding a consolidation case. Court noted advocates' absence due to abstention, accepted an undertaking to appear on future dates, and directed the authority to dispose of the case expeditiously.
What did the court decide?
Directed the concerned authority to endeavor to decide the pending case under U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 expeditiously.