The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous after a report confirmed that the underlying pending revision petition concerning land consolidation was finally decided by the relevant authority.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no specific consequential relief granted in the order text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:235481
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3860 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pyari Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
In the aforesaid circumstances, let a report be submitted by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur in regard to status of revision bearing No.989 of 2022, (Dharmendar etc. Vs. Ram Naresh etc.)
List on 12.12.2023.
Registrar (Compliance) to take steps."
Order Date :- 12.12.2023
Nirmal Sinha
Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is to be treated as infructuous in light of the status report regarding the pending revision petition.
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous after the underlying revision petition was decided.
Pyari Devi
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
