Petitioner complained that his computer case was pending due to Advocate abstention. Court accepted undertaking to appear and disposed of the writ petition, directing the authority to decide the case within six months.
Directing the concerned Authority to endeavour to decide the petitioner's case expeditiously within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:235059
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4093 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ramdeo Chaubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deo Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 12.12.2023 P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the pending computer case should be disposed of due to lack of appearance by the Advocate based on claim of abstention?
Whether the petitioner's undertaking to appear expeditiously warrants disposal of the writ petition?
Ramdeo Chaubey
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
