Radhey Shyam v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of the petitioner\'s counsel due to a call from a High Court Bar Association to abstain from work, the petitioner sought a writ directing the Consolidation Officer to decide a pending application under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, within a stipulated period.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Consolidation Officer to decide the pending application expeditiously, preferably within 18 months.