Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1904 of 1980…
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1904 of 1980
Petitioner :- Raj Bahadur Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.R. Shiv Hare,M.D.Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Kumar Nishad
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Office report dated 2.8.2023 indicates that NEC was issued to Petitioner No.1 by Registered Post fixing 21.10.2021, however, neither undelivered cover nor any appearance has been received till date, therefore, service upon petitioner Raj Bahadur is complete. However, the petitioner neither in person nor his Advocate has appeared, therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Rajesh Kumar Nishad is present on behalf of respondents.
Order Date :- 3.8.2023 SB
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Bahadur
D.D.C.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
