Petitioner challenged non-payment of family pension after her husband's death. Court directed authorities to determine and fix the pension via a positive direction within a specified timeframe.
Liberty to submit representation to District Basic Education Officer within 10 days; Respondent No. 2 to decide within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:140291
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9277 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Sarojani Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh Kachhawah,Sanjay Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
before District Basic Education Officer, Etah within a period of ten days from today and if such representation is filed then Respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the said representation by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of one month thereafter.
Order Date :- 14.7.2023 Gaurav
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to family pension after the death of her retired husband.
Whether a direction should be issued to the authorities to decide the representation regarding family pension within a fixed time.
Smt. Sarojani
State Of U.P.
District Basic Education Officer, District Etah
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
