Writ petitioner surrendered the writ petition, which the court dismissed accordingly. The withdrawal application was allowed.
The withdrawal application is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:139500
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9161 of 2018
Petitioner :- Liton Sarkar And 5 Others Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava,Sr. Advocate Ashok Khare Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Bal Mukund,Satya Priya Mishra
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
In Re: Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application
Sri Shiv Pujan Yadav (AOR A/S0752/2017) holding brief of Sri Sunil Kumar Srivastava learned counsel for the writ petitioner has made a statement at bar that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
Sri Satya Priya Mishra who appears for the respondents has not objection to the same.
Withdrawal application is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.7.2023 Rajesh
Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Liton Sarkar And 5 Others
Union Of India And 3 Others
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
