Mahesh Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Lukcnow and Ors.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:33633

¶2

Court No. - 17

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8589 of 2019

¶4

Petitioner :- Mahesh Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Lukcnow And Ors.

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Singh,P.K. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shobhit Mohan Shukla

¶6

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶7

(I.A. No. 4 of 2023)

¶8

This is an application for listing the case.

¶9

On due consideration, the application is allowed and the case is taken up today itself.

¶10

(Order on Petition)

¶11

Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, the counsel for the respondents.

¶12

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the Government Orders dated 6.9.1994 and 21.10.1994 in view of the services rendered by the petitioner as an untrained teacher.

¶13

The petitioner claims that he has filed an application for grant of the benefits which flow from the Government Orders dated 6.9.1994 and 21.10.1994, however, no decision has been taken.

¶14

Considering the said submissions and the fact that the decision is to be taken by the respondent no.2, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh application before the respondent no.2 seeking the benefits as claimed by him. In case such an application is filed, the respondent no.2 shall take a decision thereupon in accordance with law within a period of two months. The petitioner would be at liberty to place reliance on such materials as may be advised in accordance with law.

¶15

Order Date :- 15.5.2023 Mohit Singh/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mahesh Singh v. State of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Lukcnow and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Singh v. State of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Lukcnow and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alok Chandra Chaubey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Namami Gange and Gramin Jal Poorti Vibhag Lko. and 4 Others

Indra Kumar Bajpai and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Chief. Secy. Lko. and 5 Others

Ram Naresh Vs U.P. Forest Corporation Aranya Vikas Bhawan Thru. Chairman and 4 Others

Ram Autar Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Lucknow and Ors.

Shiv Raj Vs the State of U.P Thru. the Prin. Secy. Basic Education and Ors.

Suresh Kumar Vs the State of U.P Thru. the Prin. Secy. Basic Education and Ors.