The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition challenging an order denying entitlement to an old pension scheme. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to challenge the order.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order and seek incidental reliefs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:190451
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 667 of 2023
Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Sharma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Kumar Pandey,Manu Saxena
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition and challenge the order, deciding his claim regarding entitlement to the old pension scheme, which has been passed by the respondents.
In this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order and seek incidental reliefs.
Mr. Anil Kumar Pandey, Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 Deepak
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhirendra Kumar Sharma
State Of U.P.
J.J. Munir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
