Petitioner's counsel argued the writ is now infructuous as the petitioner has retired from service. The High Court accepted this and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:190453
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17851 of 2015
Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anurag Khanna,Himadri Batra,Surya Bhan Singh
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Tiwari states that this petition has become infructuous, as the petitioner has retired from service and this petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Mr. Surya Bhan Singh, Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 Deepak
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Kumar
State Of U.P.
3 Ors.
J.J. Munir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
