Disposed

Ram Naresh Chaturvedi v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Allahabad HC25 May 2023WRIA/6263/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ of mandamus for sanction and payment of gratuity pending on his retirement. Court observed no useful purpose in keeping the petition pending and directed the respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation within two months. Court reserved merits.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No. 4 to pass appropriate orders on the pending representation dated 14.2.2023 within two months from the date of service of this order.

Ram Naresh Chaturvedi Vs State of U.P. and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:116949

¶2

Court No. - 36

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6263 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Ram Naresh Chaturvedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Krishna Patel,Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Archana Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Shri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mrs. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 5.

¶7

By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to to sanction and pay gratuity to the petitioner on his retirement at the age of 60 years with admissible interest at earliest.

¶8

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in respect thereof petitioner has already preferred a representation dated 14.2.2023 before the respondent No. 4 and the same is still pending consideration.

¶9

He further submits that purpose of filing this writ petition would be served if directions are issued to the respondent No. 4 to pass appropriate orders on the pending representation of the petitioner.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that they have no objection to the aforesaid proposition.

¶11

Considering the submissions advanced, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending and the same is accordingly, disposed of requiring the respondent No. 4, seized with the representation of the petitioner dated 14.2.2023, to pass appropriate orders thereon, after considering all aspects of the matter, strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of service of a certified copy of the order of this Court.

¶12

Needless to say that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and it shall be open for the respondent No. 4 to pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

Order Date :- 25.5.2023 Ravi Prakash

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Naresh Chaturvedi v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Naresh Chaturvedi v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Danish Kamal and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ayushman Gupta Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Subhawati Devi Vs Union of India and 3 Others

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sudha Rani Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Shyam Narayan and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others