The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear in court, despite the respondent's counsel being present.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:47149
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4005 of 2004
Petitioner :- Surendra Narain Misra Respondent :- D.M. Sultanpur And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Singh,Sharad Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.
Order Date :- 19.7.2023 Adarsh K Singh
Digitally signed by :- ADARSH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Surendra Narain Misra
D.M. Sultanpur
Irshad Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
