Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P.through Prin.Secy.Labour and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for want of prosecution of WRIT - A No. 6844 of 2002 before Irshad Ali, J., Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (order dated 14.7.2023). Deemed service of notice under Chapter VIII Rule 12 Explanation II of High Court Rules; registered card notice dispatch No. 3829 dated 28.04.2023 undelivered and not returned; no vakalatnama filed by petitioner Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava; petitioner absent, learned Additional CSC present for respondent State; interim order, if any, vacated. No cases cited; no substantive issues decided.
What did the court decide?
Notice issued to the petitioner is deemed to be sufficient service under Chapter VIII Rule 12 Explanation II of the High Court Rules, as the undelivered envelope was not received back and no vakalatnama was filed. ¶¶8