The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh, citing improper constitution. The respondents had no objection. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:237028
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24970 of 2018
Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Singh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghavendra Sharan Tiwari,Siddharth Khare
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Piyush Shukla
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
At the very outset, Sri Neeraj Tiwari seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, as according to him, the present petition has not properly been constituted.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the same.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 A. Prajapati
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumar Singh Yadav
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
