Writ petition for ACP benefits dismissed as barred by constructive res judicata because the claim could have been raised in a previously disposed writ petition regarding pension.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:222280
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19489 of 2023
Petitioner :- Chhatrapal Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Agrahari,Mahima Sahai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 23.11.2023 P Kesari
Digitally signed by :- PRACHI KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for ACP benefits is barred as it could have been claimed in an earlier writ petition.
Whether a prima facie case exists regarding the denial of ACP benefits.
Chhatrapal Gupta
State Of U.P.
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
