The High Court held that the petitioner, as a legal heir of a deceased teacher who died before attaining 60 years of age, is entitled to death-cum-retirement gratuity under the applicable Government Order.
Direction to Respondents No. 3 & 4 to ensure payment of death-cum-retirement gratuity within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:185714
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15530 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Haripyari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Ved Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Bhanu Pratap Singh Kachhawah
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
that the case of the petitioner is covered by the Government Order dated 03.02.2023 and the petitioner is entitled for the death-cum-retirement gratuity.
Order Date :- 25.9.2023
Gaurav
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to death-cum-retirement gratuity under the Government Order dated 03.02.2023.
Whether the respondents were arbitary in not paying the gratuity to the petitioner.
Whether appropriate relief should be granted to ensure payment of gratuity.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Usha Rani Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶7
Writ-A No. 17399 of 2019 (Usha Rani Vs. State of U.P. and 6 others)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Haripyari
State Of U.P.
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
