Due to efflux of time rendering the PIL infructuous, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition and vacated any interim order.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 8298 of 2016
Petitioner :- Kamad Prakash Nigam Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Its Prin.Secy.Home U.P.Lko.And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C S C,A.S.G.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
None present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any slip for passing over or adjournment has been sent.
Mr. Indrajeet Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that due to efflux of time the petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, if the cause of filing of the present petition still survives, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application for recall of this order within two months from today.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 25.1.2023 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kamad Prakash Nigam
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
