Chandra Bali v. State of U.P. and 8 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition concerning encroachments, the petitioner's counsel was absent despite instructions to stand counsel. The respondent argued encroachments were already removed, rendering the petition infructuous. The High Court dismissed the PIL.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed as the matter rendered infructuous due to removal of encroachments and absence of petitioner's counsel.