Disposed

Dilip Kumar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC18 Aug 2023WPIL/1133/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of a PIL Raj concerning alleged illegal encroachments on Gram Sabha land. It directed the revenue authorities to decide pending cases under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the concerned court to decide pending encroachment cases under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within three months.

Dilip Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Landlord and Tenant | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:166747

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1133 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Ji Singh,Balendra Deo Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Balendra Deo Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Vijay Bhan Singh holding brief of Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Gram Sabha.

¶7

The present petition has been filed as a Public Interest Litigation seeking to raise a grievance with regard to alleged illegal encroachments over Gram Sabha land bearing Gata No. 203 (recorded as 'Khalihan') and Gata No.204 (recorded as 'Abadi'), situate in Village- Ismailpur, Tehsil- Belthra Road, District- Ballia.

¶8

Counsel for the State respondents submits that pursuant to the previous order, instructions have been received from the respondent no.4 wherein it is indicated that in respect of the complaints with regard to the aforestated encroachments, proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; in respect of plot no.203 , have been initiated with the institution of Case Nos. T202315090701397, T202315090701398, T202315090701396; and in respect of plot no. 204 , with the institution of case nos. T202315090701400, T202315090701399, T202315090701402, T202315090701401.

¶9

It is submitted that efforts would be made to conclude the proceedings at an early date after giving due opportunity to the parties concerned.

¶10

Counsel for the petitioner though not disputing the stand taken by the State-respondents seeks an expeditious disposal of the pending proceedings.

¶11

Having regard to the aforementioned facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court concerned would be expected to make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid cases in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the instant order, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶12

Order Date :- 18.8.2023 Mohini

¶13

[Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.]

¶14

Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dilip Kumar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

U.P State Road Transport Corporation Vs Smt. Anita Devi and 4 Others

Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Vs Bhasin Infotech and Infrastructure Private Limited

Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Vs Bhasin Infotech and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Smt Nirmala Devi Vs Bhullan Prasad and 2 Others

Amar Dev Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Prem Chand Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others