PIL petitioner did not appear to press claims. Respondent affidavit stated no unauthorized construction existed. Court disposed of matter.
PIL dismissed by disposing of the matter with no further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 11262 of 2013
Petitioner :- Masarrat Husain
Respondent :- Union Of India Through Secretary Culture New Delhi And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anadi Krishna Sinha,Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Ajay Kumar Singh,Gaurav Mehrotra,Rajnish Kumar Singh,Syed Aftab Ahmad
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this PIL.
Sri Rajnish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3, has filed an affidavit which is taken on record.
Sri S.B. Pandey, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India assisted by Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for Union of India is present.
In view of the averments made in paragraph 5 of the said affidavit, there appears no existence of unauthorized construction on the spot in question.
In view of the above, the present PIL stands disposed of.
Let the matter be consigned to record.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 6.2.2023 Pradeep/-
Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Masarrat Husain
Union Of India Through Secretary Culture New Delhi
Ramesh Sinha
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
