Babita v. State of U. P. and others
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer application regarding a criminal trial threatened with compromise was dismissed as it lacked merit.
What did the court decide?
The transfer application is dismissed.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:217970
Court No. - 83
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 672 of 2023
Applicant :- Babita Opposite Party :- State Of U. P. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Chandan Bhagat,Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Chandan Bhagat, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Umesh Chandra Verma, learned A.G.A for the State are present.
The present transfer application has been filed to transfer the Case No. 1230 of 2019 (State Vs. Pooja Sharma and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 648 of 2018 under Sections 420 and 406 of I.P.C pending in the court o Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat to any other competent court of district judgeship, Meerut.
Learned counsel for the applicant is the first informant of the above noted case. It is further submitted on 25.05.2023 when the applicant reached near district court Baghpat, opposite party nos. 2 and 5 and two other unknown persons blocked her way and threatened to compromise. It is further submitted that on 26.05.2023 the applicant moved an application before the SSP Baghpat through a registered post. It is further submitted that on 06.09.2023 opposite party nos. 2 and 5 again threatened the applicant with dire consequences and the applicant again moved an application to SSP Baghpat.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Babita
- respondent
State Of U. P.
Coram
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- TACR/672/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court