The single judge dismissed the Criminal Transfer Application as not pressed, noting the absence of the second opposing party.
Transfer application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:229450
Court No. - 83
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 656 of 2023
Applicant :- Mukesh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Madhukar Maurya,Rishabh Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anuj Agarwal,Harsh Vardhan Deshwar
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Rishabh Agrawa, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Tejbhan Singh, learned A.G.A for the State are present, however, even in the revised call none has appeared for opposite party no. 2.
Learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the present transfer application.
Accordingly, the present transfer application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 4.12.2023 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukesh And 2 Others
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
