The Allahabad High Court dismissed a second appeal for default due to the appellant's counsel's failure to take steps since 07.03.2022, invoking Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the High Court Rules, 1952.
The present appeal is dismissed in terms of Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 354 of 2012
Appellant :- Bare Munna Alias Sharad Kumar And Ors. Respondent :- Smt. Chandra Alias Rajeshwari Counsel for Appellant :- Govind Saran Nigam,Abhisht Saran Counsel for Respondent :- Mahendra P.Verma
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The present appeal is of the year 2012 and is listed under Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
Since 07.03.2022, the learned counsel for the appellants has failed to take steps.
Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in terms of Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Asheesh
Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bare Munna Alias Sharad Kumar And Ors.
Smt. Chandra Alias Rajeshwari
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
