A second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear to press the matter on the fixed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:59914
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 330 of 1986
Appellant :- Baidu And Another Respondent :- Ram Achal And Another Counsel for Appellant :- S. Mirza
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The instant appeal is of the year 1986 and has been listed under the head that 'These cases shall not be adjourned'.
The record indicates that the matter was listed on 11.09.2023 but since the Members of the Bar were abstaining from judicial work, the matter was fixed for 19.09.2023.
Today, again there is none to press the appeal.
Accordingly, it is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consign to record.
Order Date :- 19.9.2023 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Baidu And Another
Ram Achal And Another
Jaspreet Singh J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
