Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the sole appellant, reported dead in 2023, did not apply for substitution despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:75478
Court No. - 19 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 191 of 1988 Appellant :- Smt.Dharma Respondent :- Khushyal And Others Counsel for Appellant :- D.P.Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- Qamar Ahmad,K.P.Singh,S.D.Chaturvedi,Shyam Bahadur Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The appeal is of the year 1988. Record indicates that card notice was issued to the appellant and as per office report dated 05.10.2023, the sole appellant is also reported to be dead. No application for substitution or any other application has been made on behalf of the appellant.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 16.11.2023 Ashutosh Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Dharma
Khushyal
Others
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
