In this Habeas Corpus writ petition, the High Court dismissed the matter infructuous because the corpus was restored to the custody of the petitioner.
The instant petition is dismissed as being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 97 of 2023
Petitioner :- Km. Purnima Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Heard Sri Dharmendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as the corpus has been restored to the custody of petitioner no. 2 (her mother), the instant petition has now become infructuous and the same may be dismissed accordingly.
Learned A.G.A. did not raise objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as being infructuous.
Order Date :- 30.1.2023 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Km. Purnima Singh
Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
